Question 1:
A
Mendelian experiment consisted of breeding tall pea plants bearing
violet flowers with short pea plants bearing white flowers. The
progeny all bore violet flowers, but almost half of them were short.
This suggests that the genetic make-up of the tall parent can be
depicted as
(a) TTWW
(b) TTww
(c) TtWW
(d) TtWw
(c) The
genetic make-up of the tall parent can be depicted as TtWW
Since all
the progeny bore violet flowers, it means that the tall plant having
violet flowers has WW genotype for violet flower colour.
Since the
progeny is both tall and short, the parent plant was not a pure tall
plant. Its genotype must be Tt.
Therefore,
the cross involved in the given question is
- TtWw×ttww↓TtWw−ttww
Therefore,
half the progeny is tall, but all of them have violet flowers.
Question 2:
An example
of homologous organs is
(a) our
arm and a dog’s fore-leg.
(b) our
teeth and an elephant’s tusks.
(c) potato
and runners of grass.
(d) all of
the above.
(b)An
example of homologous organs is our teeth
and an elephant’s tusks.
Question 3:
In evolutionary terms, we have more in common with
(a) a Chinese school-boy.
(b) a chimpanzee.
(c) a spider.
(d) a bacterium.
(a) In evolutionary terms, we have more in common with a Chinese
school boy.
Question 4:
A study
found that children with light-coloured eyes are likely to have
parents with light-coloured eyes. On this basis, can we say anything
about whether the light eye colour trait is dominant or recessive?
Why or why not?
Let us
assume that children with light-coloured eyes can either have LL or
Ll or ll genotype. If the children have LL genotype, then their
parents will also be of LL genotype.
- LL×
LL ↓LL
If the
children with light-coloured eyes have ll genotype, then their
parents will also have ll genotype.
- ll×
ll ↓ll
Therefore,
it cannot be concluded whether light eye colour is dominant or
recessive.
Question 5:
How
are the areas of study − evolution
and classification − interlinked?
Classification
involves grouping of organism into a formal system based on
similarities in internal and external structure or evolutionary
history.
Two
species are more closely related if they have more characteristics in
common. And if two species are more closely related, then it means
they have a more recent ancestor.
For
example, in a family, a brother and sister are closely related and
they have a recent common ancestor i.e., their parents. A brother and
his cousin are also related but less than the sister and her brother.
This is because the brother and his cousin have a common ancestor
i.e., their grandparents in the second generation whereas the parents
were from the first generation.
With
subsequent generations, the variations make organisms more different
than their ancestors.
This
discussion clearly proves that we classify organisms according to
their resemblance which is similar to creating an evolutionary tree.
Question 6:
Explain the terms analogous and homologous organs with examples.
Homologous
organs are similar in origin (or are
embryologically similar) but perform different functions. For
example, the forelimbs of humans and the wings of birds look
different externally but their skeletal structure is similar. It
means that their origin is similar (as wings in birds are
modifications of forearm) but functions are different - the wings
help in flight whereas human forearm helps in various activities.
Homologous organs
Analogous
organs, on the other hand, have
different origin but perform similar functions. For example, the
wings of a bird and a bat are similar in function but this similarity
does not mean that these animals are more closely related. If we
carefully look at these structures, then we will find that the wings
of a bat are just the folds of skin that are stretched between its
fingers whereas the wings of birds are present all along the arm.
Therefore, these organs are analogous
organs.
Question 7:
Outline a
project which aims to find the dominant coat colour in dogs.
Dogs have
a variety of genes that govern coat colour. There are at least eleven
identified gene series (A, B, C, D, E, F, G, M, P, S, T) that
influence coat colour in dog.
A dog
inherits one gene from each of its parents. The dominant gene gets
expressed in the phenotype. For example, in the B series, a dog can
be genetically black or brown.
Let us
assume that one parent is homozygous black (BB), while the other
parent is homozygous brown (bb)
bb
|
BB
|
||
B
|
B
|
||
b
|
Bb
|
Bb
|
|
b
|
Bb
|
Bb
|
In this case, all the offsprings will be heterozygous (Bb).
Since
black (B) is dominant, all the offsprings will be black. However,
they will have both B and b alleles.
If such
heterozygous pups are crossed, they will produce 25% homozygous black
(BB), 50% heterozygous black (Bb), and 25% homozygous brown (bb)
offsprings.
B
|
b
|
|
B
|
BB
|
Bb
|
b
|
Bb
|
Bb
|
Question 8:
Explain the importance of fossils in deciding evolutionary
relationships.
Fossils are the remains of the organism that once existed on
earth. They represent the ancestors of the plants and animals that
are alive today. They provide evidences of evolution by revealing the
characteristics of the past organisms and the changes that have
occurred in these organisms to give rise to the present organisms.
Let us explain the importance of fossils in deciding evolutionary
history with the help of the following example.
Around 100 million years ago, some invertebrates died and were
buried in the soil in that area. More sediment accumulated on top of
it turning it into sedimentary rock.
At the same place, millions of years later, some dinosaurs died
and their bodies were buried on top of the sedimentary rock. The mud
containing dinosaurs also turned into a rock.
Then, millions of years later, some horse-like creatures died in
that area and got fossilized in rocks above the dinosaur fossils.
Some time later, due to soil erosion or floods in that area, the
rocks containing horse-like fossils are exposed.
If that area is excavated deeper, then the dinosaur and
invertebrates fossils can also be found. Thus, by digging that area,
scientists can easily predict that horse-like animals evolved later
than the dinosaurs and the invertebrates.
Thus, the above example suggests that the fossils found closer to
the surface of the earth are more recent ones than the fossils
present in deeper layers.
Layers of fossils
Question 9:
What evidence do we have for the origin of life from inanimate
matter?
A
British scientist, J.B.S. Haldane, suggested that life originated
from simple inorganic molecules. He believed that when the earth was
formed, it was a hot gaseous mass containing elements such as
nitrogen, oxygen, carbon, hydrogen, etc. These elements combined to
form molecules like water (H2O),
carbon dioxide (CO2),
methane (CH4),
ammonia (NH3),
etc.
After
the formation of water, slowly the earth surface cooled and the
inorganic molecules interacted with one another in water to form
simple organic molecules such as sugars, fatty acids, amino acids,
etc. The energy for these reactions was provided by solar radiations,
lightning, volcanic eruptions, etc.
This was
proved by the experiment of Stanley L. Miller and Harold C. Urey in
1953.
They
took a mixture of water (H2O),
methane (CH4),
ammonia (NH3),
and hydrogen gas (H2)
in a chamber and sparks were passed through this mixture using two
electrodes. After one week, 15% of the carbon from methane was
converted into amino acids, sugars, etc. These organic molecules are
polymerized and assembled to form protein molecules that gave rise to
life on earth.
Miller and Urey experiment
Question 10:
Explain
how sexual reproduction gives rise to more viable variations than
asexual reproduction. How does this affect the evolution of those
organisms that reproduce sexually?
In sexual
reproduction, two individuals having different variations combine
their DNA to give rise to a new individual. Therefore, sexual
reproduction allows more variations, whereas in asexual reproduction,
chance variations can only occur when the copying of DNA is not
accurate.
Additionally,
asexual reproduction allows very less variations because if there are
more variations, then the resultant DNA will not be able to survive
inside the inherited cellular apparatus.
However,
in sexual reproduction, more variations are allowed and the resultant
DNA is also able to survive, thus making the variations viable.
Variation
and Evolution: Variants help the
species to survive in all the conditions. Environmental conditions
such as heat, light, pests, and food availability can change suddenly
at only one place. At that time, only those variants resistant to
these conditions would be able to survive. This will slowly lead to
the evolution of a better adapted species. Thus, variation helps in
the evolution of sexually reproducing organisms.
Question 11:
How is the
equal genetic contribution of male and female parents ensured in the
progeny?
In human
beings, every somatic cell of the body contains 23 pairs of
chromosomes. Out of these 23 pairs, the first 22 pairs are known as
autosomes and the remaining one pair is known as sex chromosomes
represented as X and Y.
Females
have two X chromosomes and males have one X and one Y chromosome.
The gamete
receives half of the chromosomes. Therefore, the male gametes have 22
autosomes and either X or Y chromosome.
The female
gamete, on the other hand, has 22 autosomes and X chromosome.
During
reproduction, the male and female gametes fuse and thus the progeny
receives 22 autosomes and one X or Y chromosome from male parent and
22 autosomes and one X chromosome from the female parent.
Question 12:
Only
variations that confer an advantage to an individual organism will
survive in a population. Do you agree with this statement? Why or why
not?
In
species, variations that offer survival advantages
are naturally selected. Individuals adjust to their environments with
the help of these selected variations and consequently these
variations are passed on to their progeny. Evolution of organisms
occurs as a result of this natural selection.
However,
there can be some other variations, which do not offer any survival
advantage and arise only accidentally. Such variations in small
populations can change the frequency of some genes even if they are
not important for survival.
This
accidental change in the frequency of genes in small populations is
referred to as genetic drift.
Thus,
genetic drift provides diversity (variations) without any survival
advantage.